Beoardielingen foar Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized troch Wikiwand
691 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Aphotic, 2 jierren lynnow its filled with ads, 1 star.
alternative addon:
Modern for Wikipedia
by Modern Redesigns - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Schorle, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16073868, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18749240, 2 jierren lynWikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Mikaïl, 2 jierren lynThe AI features are useless, used it once and didn't even answer my question, might as well use ChatGPT for AI
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch OzMerry, 2 jierren lynSo, I wrote a negative review yesterday (which I've now deleted), but it appears that the Wikiwand add-on was updated yesterday and it's now working again. Yay! The AI Tools block on the right can be minimised and an ad blocker takes care of ads, but I may just upgrade to a paid version anyway since I use Wikipedia a lot and WIkiwand (pro) is very reasonably priced and supports the existing and ongoing development efforts of a great add-on. FWIW, I think it's worth it to get a much better reading experience than ordinary Wikipedia for frequent users.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Richard Yan, 2 jierren lynUsed to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Tamm Horsfall, 2 jierren lynPutting ads and AI-slop on a free to use webpage is peak greed, well done. You are a shadow of your former self.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch linuxenjoyer, 2 jierren lynIt was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Nick, 2 jierren lynI'll stick with Wiki's default look if it means no ads, no random AI stuff, etc. Have been a user for some time, but I guess all good things must come to an end.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18744013, 2 jierren lynI've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch AP6YC, 2 jierren lynWikiwand is absolute trash now. Nonsense AI tools are pushed nonstop, and ads are inserted in so many places in the page. What a waste of what was once a great tool. Go somewhere else to format Wiki pages.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18743018, 2 jierren lynStarted as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18229951, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18725086, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch rey, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Xen, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Joey, 2 jierren lynDoes not enhance the user experience of Wikipedia at all. Instead, it changes the look slightly and then bombards you with pop-ups trying to get you to buy their AI service whenever you try to read an article.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14528042, 2 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Seän "Frostbyte" Shepherd, 2 jierren lyn