全ページのブラウザ撮影ツール — FireShot のレビュー
全ページのブラウザ撮影ツール — FireShot 作成者: TruePage
TELLALL4ALL によるレビュー
5 段階中 2 の評価
TELLALL4ALL によるレビュー (4年前)8-2-25: no improvement. Can't deal with large pages and gives an error. Cant snapshot parts of pages except under ffox. SLOW there are no really good snapshot addons that I have seen
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
合計レビュー数: 2,651
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 20131135 によるレビュー (8日前)Хлам который мало того что не способен захватить страницу, так ещё и 100500 вкладок открывает непонятно зачем.
- 5 段階中 5 の評価退出党团队远离中共邪教访问c88c.us によるレビュー (9日前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 13817468 によるレビュー (11日前)Always auto updating for nothing except to force you to try the pro version (with a badge in the icon), even if the update parameter is off. Need the paid version for text selection in the saved pdf. Was good, now abusing is position.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価RedOnBlack によるレビュー (15日前)40$ yearly Pro and 100$ lifetime?! What is the author sniffing... I can still pay so much for an antivirus, but not for an add-on to a web browser, it takes low-quality screenshots and PDFs, I tried the trial period, it’s not worth a 1$...
- 5 段階中 1 の評価zak-agitavit によるレビュー (24日前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 20112464 によるレビュー (1ヶ月前)at first I didn't see the point, but now I can't browse without it
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Karim Elsayad によるレビュー (1ヶ月前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 16620291 によるレビュー (2ヶ月前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 20082668 によるレビュー (2ヶ月前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価wheatberry によるレビュー (2ヶ月前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 17841406 によるレビュー (2ヶ月前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価www.H-Med.TV によるレビュー (3ヶ月前)Simply the best, no BS, plenty of options, works flawlessly. I use it on every browser, and it creates free professional quality results that we're able to capture data and feature the screenshots in our youtube videos (sharing our sources on screen for educational info). Kudos to the dev, fantastic addition required for every browser.
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 13513062 によるレビュー (3ヶ月前)It requires a paid subscription to get proper links in a PDF snapshot. It also gets updated way too frequently, without any new features, but just ask from the user to pay for a subscription. It is not worth it.