Shinigami Eyes에 대한 리뷰
Shinigami Eyes 제작자: Shinigami Eyes
moss eater 님의 리뷰
5점 만점에 1점
moss eater 님, 3달 전Not worth it.
This isn't useful anymore, there are too many false positives for it to be helpful. You have to go to each account and individually verify whether they were marked as red/green correctly, which defeats the entire point of the extension.
For example, there are many pro-trans advocates and allies are marked red, despite no wrongdoing, by people with personal grudges against them. And there are transphobic people who are marked green purely on the basis of being trans. Who gets marked as red or green isn't supposed to be dictated by one's identity, or by differing opinions on smaller matters within the LGBT+ community (like disagreements over using neopronouns or micro-labels).
The system is supposed to be: red=unsafe (dangerous transphobic accounts), and green=safe (vocal, proactive supporters of trans rights). Because this extension is being misused and poorly moderated, that system doesn't function anymore.
A lot of trans rights supporters, many of whom are trans themselves, are marked red because they talk positively about intersex people, non-binary people (including non-binary transfemmes and transmascs), trans men, or trans people of color. Many Black trans people specifically are reporting that they've been falsely flagged as red because they critique racial disparities within the broader queer and trans communities; this is an unacceptable misuse of the SE extension to isolate or discredit Black transgender people.
I used to rely on SE to quickly block transphobes like TERFs to keep myself safe online, but these days the TERFs are hardly getting flagged as red at all, and too many times I've checked a red account and realized it's just somebody who discussed intersexism, with no evidence to any instances of transphobia in their account history.
This is wrong and demonstrates biases in the team moderating the extension and the dwindling userbase. This needs to be fixed and the rules clarified (and enforced better by the SE curators) to make this extension safe to use again.
This isn't useful anymore, there are too many false positives for it to be helpful. You have to go to each account and individually verify whether they were marked as red/green correctly, which defeats the entire point of the extension.
For example, there are many pro-trans advocates and allies are marked red, despite no wrongdoing, by people with personal grudges against them. And there are transphobic people who are marked green purely on the basis of being trans. Who gets marked as red or green isn't supposed to be dictated by one's identity, or by differing opinions on smaller matters within the LGBT+ community (like disagreements over using neopronouns or micro-labels).
The system is supposed to be: red=unsafe (dangerous transphobic accounts), and green=safe (vocal, proactive supporters of trans rights). Because this extension is being misused and poorly moderated, that system doesn't function anymore.
A lot of trans rights supporters, many of whom are trans themselves, are marked red because they talk positively about intersex people, non-binary people (including non-binary transfemmes and transmascs), trans men, or trans people of color. Many Black trans people specifically are reporting that they've been falsely flagged as red because they critique racial disparities within the broader queer and trans communities; this is an unacceptable misuse of the SE extension to isolate or discredit Black transgender people.
I used to rely on SE to quickly block transphobes like TERFs to keep myself safe online, but these days the TERFs are hardly getting flagged as red at all, and too many times I've checked a red account and realized it's just somebody who discussed intersexism, with no evidence to any instances of transphobia in their account history.
This is wrong and demonstrates biases in the team moderating the extension and the dwindling userbase. This needs to be fixed and the rules clarified (and enforced better by the SE curators) to make this extension safe to use again.
리뷰 1,436개
- i don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.
it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 20047351 님, 7일 전
- Like. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
- pretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic
- alright I gotta swallow my pride and say that when I made my last review, I was duped. I was poorly informed by the reviews, and after using the plugin and better understanding the actual conversation around the relevant issues, I'm changing my 1 star review to a 5 star review.
Effective plugin, and it feels nice to see green names going around. Recommended if you think it would help you. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 20037153 님, 12일 전I looked at the guidelines when wondering why so many pro-transgender pages are marked red and it sounds like using assigned-gender-at-birth language is being encouraged as "do not mark trans-friendly" due to transmisogyny. Julia Serrano's article on what transmisogyny is does use that language. So am I supposed to mark Julia Serrano as anti-trans??? I'm supposed to flag the woman who coined the term "transmisogyny" as being violently transphobic? That sounds rather counterproductive! Can the developer explain why this is supposed to make sense? Are people flagging others just to see them turn red? Did anti-trans people raid the app, and the mods just can't keep up?
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20033086 님, 14일 전I got marked red because I said I headcanoned ralsei as transmasc
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 20031774 님, 15일 전Insanely transphobic, exorsexist, and intersexist, it's so disappointing
- 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 17758123 님, 16일 전
- 5점 만점에 1점explodingcows54 님, 17일 전very commonly see transmeds (people who police transness) marked as green and trans men marked as red, with no evidence theyre anti trans or trans friendly. lacks unbiased review.
- 5점 만점에 5점EmpurressNepetaIII 님, 20일 전
- It works fine. Of course anything with a community-sourced database is gonna have its misfires, but overall it serves its purpose well enough.
I'd like the ability to mark stuff on mobile firefox too, though. Or at least to be able to manually import an override list, or something along those lines. - 5점 만점에 5점Firefox 사용자 16876736 님, 23일 전if you are a trans woman you NEED this extention. if you are a trans man who knows transandrophobia is not an actual axis of oppression and wants to be more of a transfeminist you NEED this extention.
- 5점 만점에 1점Firefox 사용자 19938679 님, 23일 전Horribly transphobic extension! It marks trans men/mascs, nonbinary people, and intersex people as "transphobic" for simply talking about the oppression they face, meanwhile trans women/fems are allowed to be as racist, ableist, and laterally queerphobic as they want, and they're somehow fine. The creators of this extension should be ashamed of themselves. At best, there's no oversight or verification of any kind to prevent this, and at worst, this is something they actively encourage. Absolutely disgusting.