Shinigami Eyes Autor: Shinigami Eyes

2,5 gwiazdki/5

Autor recenzji: sb

I've used Shinigami Eyes on Firefox for several years, beginning around 2020 or 2021. Since then, I've seen a notable shift in the kinds of users marked as anti-trans and trans-friendly on social platforms, most notably Tumblr.

This extension, for what it is worth, is still largely helpful when browsing online to identify public figures, media outlets, and other organizations that platform anti-trans rhetoric by marking articles, news websites, and even Wikipedia pages. This is something that this extension still does well.

However, when it comes to social platform users in queer online spaces, the kinds of users marked anti-trans have completely changed. While an official guide to who should or should not be marked red on Shinigami Eyes, this guideline no longer appears to be relevant. In the past, users were marked pretty reliably based on these rules: someone must be visibly anti-trans and/or a transmisogynist. Today, it appears that users who outwardly support transfeminine (and other trans individuals regardless of identity) are still at risk of being marked anti-trans if they speak against bioessentialism (an emphasis on someone's clinical "s*x") or speak on concerns relating to intersexism. This is strange to me, as transgender and intersex individuals face similar (NOT identical, but overlapping) issues regarding medical autonomy and civil rights.

It seems like the system of Shinigami Eyes is now primarily used to indicate that intersex and otherly-sexed individuals and activists are inherently transmisogynist. I recommend that users who use Shinigami Eyes be extra cautious in vetting who is or is not anti-trans as the extension stands today.

1450 recenzji

Ocena: 1/5
Autor: The Shadow Dragon, 5 godzin temu
There is a serious problem with Trans men and trans masc individuals being falsely flagged as Transphobic because they dare to speak out against transmisandry and anti-transmasculinity...
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 20091312, 19 godzin temu
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Kat_, 4 dni temu
I do think there are silly red ratings that don't actually help with anything, such as rating historical figures (wow are you telling me Hitler was transphobic?), the addon is solid. You really cannot always trust someone who is marked green, but if you are a transfem, you sould really stay away from anyone marked red, no matter how much they whinge about it. Every time I checked, there was good reason to mark them red (participating in mass harassment campaigns, constantly being antifeminist, being friends/mutuals with actual radfems, peddling male/female socialization type rhetoric and other bio-essentialist garbage). 100% of those 1 star reviews are from transmisogynists and it's clear to see. When they talk about radfem trans women, they're not referring to the small minority of transfems who try to recycle actual radfem ideology (an incorrect position) but any trans woman who might've read Whipping Girl or has a basic understanding of intersectionality or is just a bit too uppity.

Take their 1star reviews as good reason to install this addon.
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: windowsxp, 7 dni temu
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: opek, 7 dni temu
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: Incendiary, 7 dni temu
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: h.h., 8 dni temu
Ocena: 2/5
Autor: sd, 8 dni temu
I used it for years. It used to be very good at telling if someone is more covert about their transphobia-
However, lately, the people doing all the rating and anybody who might be approving those ratings only seem to care about trans women (and not even all trans women, seemingly just the ones repeating radfem rhetoric), and nobody else. I have seen people marked red for no reason other than supporting transgender men, nonbinary people, and intersex people. Most of whom never used that "transandrophobia" term that people seem to hate so much.

Seems like trans 4channers also get marked as green frequently as well. You mean to tell me the woman I saw talking about "TME theyfab pooners" is pro-trans? She probably isn't even pro-trans in regards to herself, let alone others who don't fit specific standards.
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: moonar, 8 dni temu
helpful
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 20071927, 10 dni temu
Ocena: 2/5
Autor: SpoopySoup, 12 dni temu
I just want a little bit more transparency, more options in the options page (like more colors for ones you marked yourself, or if it was verified by the team running this), maybe hover notes on why a page was submitted and colored with simple 'time updated' metadata, because what if the mark was from ages ago and nobody looked to update it if it was someone being 14 or something 10 years ago.

I use it mostly to take a page, blog, or person with a grain of salt and to look into it myself, because sometimes transmeds can be green and someone simply with unusual pronouns for their gender can be red.
I probably used this for so long every time I see a colored blog it likely is my mark that's clientside, which is why I still use it, since I constantly curate it.

Nobody can perfectly verify everything and some can fly under the radar, if you are using this plugin, PLEASE don't be afraid to mark/submit your findings too, there may be issues but you can help by submitting the correct dropdown even if its already marked. Even clearing marks is helpful.
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: black flying fox, 12 dni temu
stay away. just for trans radfems now
Ocena: 2/5
Autor: siam, 12 dni temu
not much help when it doesnt tell you why someone was marked red. when i come across a youtube channel marked red, and the channel is nothing but innocuous content unrelated to lgbt issues, am i supposed to just believe that? im not going through all their social media to find the truth. transphobia is a heavy accusation, you best have a good reason for it.
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: tumbwr, 12 dni temu
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 16038924, 13 dni temu
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: NyxieNyxious, 14 dni temu
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Foosy, 15 dni temu
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 19984572, 18 dni temu
The negative reviews are from terf bots, ignore.
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: tom9mi, 19 dni temu
Ocena: 2/5
Autor: dreadful, 20 dni temu
i don't care about tmras and transmisogynists whinging about how they're being bullied for spreading vile bs abt trans women, but i have seen actual 4tranners get marked green, including a dedicated 4tran subreddit. come the fuck on. you wouldn't call an edtwt user a feminist for saying moid.

it's just become a discourse tool now, which is functionally useless for measuring what is and is not actually unsafe for trans people (esp women) to be around.
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: Jak, 20 dni temu
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Użytkownik Firefoksa 20047351, 22 dni temu
Ocena: 1/5
Autor: KYLEGUTZZ, 23 dni temu
Like. SO many trans men, non-binary and intersex people are marked as transphobic on this thing for speaking about the oppression they face. So fucked. Also like. a lot of black trans people are marked red for no reason??? Racist and transphobic, avoid at all costs. If you need to check if a page or blog is transphobic, just do the work yourself.
Ocena: 5/5
Autor: Luna, 23 dni temu
y'all the rating are community made if someone who is a trans ally is marked red it's because people using the extension marked it as red for some reason
Ocena: 4/5
Autor: bunglung, 25 dni temu
pretty good. ive been using it for a while and has been largely accurate. im not sure the specifics of the process. but as of late it seems false negatives within the system have been circulating just for people combating transmisogyny. one thing that would help is when somebody is marked red or green (though it would benefit red marks the most) it gives a reason why they were marked such and a link/screenshot to where the person expressed a belief which way. don't use it without checking, especially for red marks, but it can help bring your attention to whether or not a person might be transphobic