Отзывы на «AI Chat Exporter»
AI Chat Exporter от Hamza
Отзывы tenheisei
Оценено на 4 из 5
от tenheisei, 3 месяца назадWorks well. Wondering if there is any way to change the default document properties for the PDF that is generated.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 3 месяца назадHi, Thanks for the review. In the future update i can add requested features. It would be great if you could give more detail on the kind of changes you want. You can reach out to me by emailing to me by clicking on the 'Support Email' link under this add on.
UPDATE:
I have released a new version of the extension, it improves a lot of visual in the PDF. Some changes are
1- Better rendering of mathmatical equations.
2- Better spacing and division between sections
3- Now User can change the default namings of the 'AI', 'User'. Alongside colors
UPDATE:
I have released a new version of the extension, it improves a lot of visual in the PDF. Some changes are
1- Better rendering of mathmatical equations.
2- Better spacing and division between sections
3- Now User can change the default namings of the 'AI', 'User'. Alongside colors
4 отзыва
- Оценено на 2 из 5от Scott, 11 часов назадThe add-on itself is easy to use and produces a lovely PDF. However... at least when exporting a Gemini "chat", the text flow in the generated PDF is broken. Specifically, the text doesn't wrap properly (often/usually just breaks the line mid-word rather than breaking/wrapping on "white space"), and sometimes whole words or parts of words are "lost" or sheared-off at the margins. Some paragraphs just peter out mid-sentence and mid-word.
There was no warning about possible or actual truncated or hidden content.
The layout of the generated PDF itself is visually pleasing except for the fact that content is corrupted or lost. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Mekanop, день назадThanks! I appreciate the clear headers for the user prompts and chatbot responses.
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14338764, 3 месяца назадEncoding & Diacritics: There is a critical failure in rendering Polish characters, resulting in missing letters (e.g., "rodowisko" instead of "środowisko") and broken words throughout the text.
Structural Integrity: Table structures are completely degraded, appearing as fragmented text with misplaced quotes and disconnected headers.
Text Flow: Frequent unnatural line breaks and "widowed" letters (e.g., "p", "dl a") disrupt readability and professional presentation.
Code Formatting: Technical blocks lack proper indentation and contain character errors (e.g., ".0" instead of ".o"), which is problematic for a document intended for developers.
Artifact Noise: The presence of recurring system headers and page breaks within the content hinders a clean reading experience.