Відгуки для Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized
Wikiwand - Wikipedia Modernized автор Wikiwand
150 відгуків
- Оцінка 1 з 5від simurq, 3 дні томуNewer versions of the addon are getting worse with every release. AI addition is what ruins it, in my opinion. Standard Wikipedia looks prettier and loads easier without the addon's distractors.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Sushiimi, 6 днів томуWikiwand has been great for years but unfortunately, as outlined by many other reviews, has gone downhill after shoehorning in excessive AI integrations and simply becoming non-functioning for basic usage.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від TonyStr, місяць томуThis addon has been very unstable lately. It struggles to load articles and fails to load previews. This was a great reskin of wikipedia that made the interface cleaner to use, but today they rolled out a reskin that makes it look like a mobile app for some reason. They also removed perhaps the one useful functionality they had, show definition for highlighted word.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від huianxin, 3 місяці томуLike others said, used to be good. Now there's some useless new features. Stop spamming AI in my face. And worst of all, it stopped working! Keeps displaying "Article not found", making it utterly unusable. Way to ruin what was once a great app.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Elfirya, 4 місяці тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Howar31, 6 місяців томуtoo much useless features. settings are not saved keep resetting. and also ads
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Haltarys, 7 місяців томуThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 19053100, 7 місяців томуUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Sciky, 9 місяців томуThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Indiana Moon, 9 місяців томуIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 14503325, 10 місяців тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 19040033, 10 місяців томуUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Ally Simy, 10 місяців тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 19035698, 10 місяців томуEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Оцінка 1 з 5від LCM, 10 місяців томуThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Milan Regec, рік томуAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 18996590, рік тому
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Toccetness, рік томуAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Оцінка 1 з 5від Користувач Firefox 17669402, рік томуAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.