Recensioner för Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool av LanguageTooler GmbH
Recension av Dogger
Betygsatt 5 av 5
av Dogger, för 3 år sedanI love this extension. In addition to the features advertised, it's great for people with disabilities. I was a lousy typist before surgery on my right hand, and now it's worse. I make many mistakes, and simply chasing & clicking on red-lined words is difficult. Now all of my errors are collected in a single location and fixing them is a breeze. Definitely worth 5 stars.
[edit]: I just typed "tried" as "tired", an error regular spell checkers wouldn't catch. This one did. How do I give it 6 stars?
[edit]: I just typed "tried" as "tired", an error regular spell checkers wouldn't catch. This one did. How do I give it 6 stars?
5 278 recensioner
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Alice, för 10 timmar sedanWelp, here we are.
"he rise of generative AI has made it more challenging to sustainably monetize our offering".
translation: "due to the server costs of running AI in our spellchecker we will start charging money for it".
Drop AI and the server costs will instantly become more manageable, I imagine.
To be clear, I'm not against a developer charging for their product - I am against developers jumping on a fad bandwagon and then crying about it. You're running a SPELLCHECKER, guys, you don’t need AI to run a dictionary search.
But now we can have "AI POWERED PARAPHRASING" How, oh how did the product even operate before the blessing of AI???
I just cannot treat this seriously, sorry, Word processor had this running smoothly 15 years ago, catch up! - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Skin55, för 12 timmar sedanHave loved using this app for a few years now. Now, out of nowhere, it's added Ai and now is behind a paywall. Go F yourself.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av funderburg, för 18 timmar sedanPulled the usual bait-and-switch requiring payment for it to work it all. Uninstalling.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av AC, för en dag sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av mrweb, för en dag sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Retro2201, för 3 dagar sedanReally helps when communicating in a language that you're not 100% fluent.
The premium is expensive, but then it's not just a web browser extension; you can use it in countless apps, so for me it was a good deal at the time. I bought the 2 year one for around 80€. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av firaweti, för 3 dagar sedanExtrêmement pratique pour corriger des phrases entières en peu de temps. L'implémentation du correcteur est compatible avec la majorité des sites que j'ai pu consulter et les corrections ont toujours été pertinentes et rapides !
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av George, för 4 dagar sedanThis addon worked great until the premium tier became required.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Pink, för 5 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Loic225, för 5 dagar sedanIt was good until it isn't with recent change
v9.0.1 is better - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 15180680, för 6 dagar sedanNouvelles version très bof côté vie privée.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Ugarov, för 6 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Unknovvn, för 6 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 13325943, för 6 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Matrix_Cracker, för 7 dagar sedanSorry - this is the badest move you can make. Telling AI ist ramping up the costs ist really a bad one and -in two- really not true. There are a lot of good examples out there how it's done. Without harming privacy anyways. And the pricetag is much to high. As a user of the premium subscription this makes me cancel that subscription anyway, because I was in belive supporting all the free (Plug-In)-Users with the high pricetag to the desktop version.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 12303032, för 7 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 4 av 5av Firefox-användare 12165269, för 7 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av anitabueckler, för 8 dagar sedanJust use v9.0.1 and the add-on works again as it should. The dictionaries are included, that why it's about 15MB. Or we could simply edit the xpi (which is a ZIP) to fix the latest version. ;)
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av juntra, för 8 dagar sedanJeez, forcing a premium subscription to use the extension. I switched over to this from grammarly because it became AI slop filled, but now this extension has done the same and is removing the free tier because of it. AI is expensive, harms the environment, and generally isn't worth the costs. Remove the AI features and return the free tier, you'll get way more users by doing that.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av deo, för 8 dagar sedanUsed to be good, considering the free tier. Now only for premium subscribers. The developers should explicitly state this information upfront in the first lines of the extension description, allowing users to avoid spending time installing it and then uninstalling it a couple of minutes later.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Mark, för 8 dagar sedanNow asking for money for something which can be obtained for free or lower cost. Just because you dump in "AI" features that no-one asks for you can't then to try and use this to justify a "premium" price.
This move never works. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av toohehimforthem, för 8 dagar sedanUsed to be free for a long time, but has started asking for a premium subscription just to use it at all. I'm disabled and was using it to spell check but I can't afford this. I guess its back to mixed up words now if I'm not having a very efficient day with fighting it.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Clueingforbeggs, för 9 dagar sedanThey got rid of their free tier, forcing users to pay for features they clearly do not want to use (and it's obvious they know this, because they're advertising it as an upgrade to premium, despite the fact that the cost of running premium is why they're doing this), just because those features were too expensive for the people who actually want to use them.